2-year-old boy solves classic moral dilemma in hilarious and brutal manner

There is a moral dilemma that puts you in deciding the fate of a runaway train. The vehicle is speeding and there is no stopping. However, in front of you, a lever will define the way the train will go: on one of the tracks is tied a 5-year-old child; On the other track are several 80-year-olds. Who would you let get hit?

The first time this moral discussion arose was in 1967, still without specifying the age of the potential victims of the train. It was proposed by British philosopher Phillipa Ruth Foot and has been shaking the minds of researchers ever since. After all: how to decide who deserves to live and who deserves to die?

The little boy in the video above has an unorthodox solution to the problem. What if instead of having to make the choice the train could kill everyone? The video has been most successful showing the child's innocence (will it?) For something so complex. It's impossible not to laugh - even with a little guilt, of course. And if it were you, who would you let die?